<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: dashCommerce 3.0 &#8211; Summary of Changes and NO! I don&#039;t work for Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chriscyvas.com/2008/01/02/dashcommerce-30-summary-of-changes-and-no-i-dont-work-for-microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chriscyvas.com/2008/01/02/dashcommerce-30-summary-of-changes-and-no-i-dont-work-for-microsoft/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:44:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PCasagrande</title>
		<link>http://chriscyvas.com/2008/01/02/dashcommerce-30-summary-of-changes-and-no-i-dont-work-for-microsoft/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>PCasagrande</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscyvas.com/2008/01/02/dashcommerce-30-summary-of-changes-and-no-i-dont-work-for-microsoft/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Being honest I can see where you are coming from.  Better to have a few features that work well than alot of features that half work.  Unfortunately this eliminates one of my customers from being able to use 3.0 as they make heavy use of packages and such in their existing site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being honest I can see where you are coming from.  Better to have a few features that work well than alot of features that half work.  Unfortunately this eliminates one of my customers from being able to use 3.0 as they make heavy use of packages and such in their existing site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://chriscyvas.com/2008/01/02/dashcommerce-30-summary-of-changes-and-no-i-dont-work-for-microsoft/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 23:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscyvas.com/2008/01/02/dashcommerce-30-summary-of-changes-and-no-i-dont-work-for-microsoft/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Chris -

Right, point taken.  I, for one, think the MPL is a good one though perhaps the MIT license accomplishes the same basic thing in 1,000 fewer words.  The other project I&#039;m involved with - Umbraco - uses the MIT license for its &#039;framework&#039; (http://umbraco.org/license) and a hybrid license for the UI.  I like the simplicity of this and think it has helped grow Umbraco at 900% last year.  I&#039;m happy to continue this discussion elsewhere if you prefer.

Regards,
-Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris -</p>
<p>Right, point taken.  I, for one, think the MPL is a good one though perhaps the MIT license accomplishes the same basic thing in 1,000 fewer words.  The other project I&#8217;m involved with &#8211; Umbraco &#8211; uses the MIT license for its &#8216;framework&#8217; (<a href="http://umbraco.org/license" rel="nofollow">http://umbraco.org/license</a>) and a hybrid license for the UI.  I like the simplicity of this and think it has helped grow Umbraco at 900% last year.  I&#8217;m happy to continue this discussion elsewhere if you prefer.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
-Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chriscyvas</title>
		<link>http://chriscyvas.com/2008/01/02/dashcommerce-30-summary-of-changes-and-no-i-dont-work-for-microsoft/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>chriscyvas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscyvas.com/2008/01/02/dashcommerce-30-summary-of-changes-and-no-i-dont-work-for-microsoft/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul,

This gets more to licensing than the code base. I&#039;m reviewing the licensing options, and I&#039;m willing to listen to any opinions you have on the issue. I won&#039;t be making any decisions until the Beta release.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul,</p>
<p>This gets more to licensing than the code base. I&#8217;m reviewing the licensing options, and I&#8217;m willing to listen to any opinions you have on the issue. I won&#8217;t be making any decisions until the Beta release.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://chriscyvas.com/2008/01/02/dashcommerce-30-summary-of-changes-and-no-i-dont-work-for-microsoft/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscyvas.com/2008/01/02/dashcommerce-30-summary-of-changes-and-no-i-dont-work-for-microsoft/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Chris -

As is currently the case, there&#039;s nothing inherint in dC preventing me from adding in an extension class to retain this functionality once 3.0 hits - right?

Thanks,
-Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris -</p>
<p>As is currently the case, there&#8217;s nothing inherint in dC preventing me from adding in an extension class to retain this functionality once 3.0 hits &#8211; right?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
-Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chriscyvas</title>
		<link>http://chriscyvas.com/2008/01/02/dashcommerce-30-summary-of-changes-and-no-i-dont-work-for-microsoft/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>chriscyvas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscyvas.com/2008/01/02/dashcommerce-30-summary-of-changes-and-no-i-dont-work-for-microsoft/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul,

They won&#039;t be in there. 3.0 is a complete re-write, so adding them in means re-writing them as well and if I have to re-write them, then I&#039;ll want them to be more than they are.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul,</p>
<p>They won&#8217;t be in there. 3.0 is a complete re-write, so adding them in means re-writing them as well and if I have to re-write them, then I&#8217;ll want them to be more than they are.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://chriscyvas.com/2008/01/02/dashcommerce-30-summary-of-changes-and-no-i-dont-work-for-microsoft/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 15:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscyvas.com/2008/01/02/dashcommerce-30-summary-of-changes-and-no-i-dont-work-for-microsoft/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Chris -

Does this mean the &quot;Promotions, Campaigns, and Bundles&quot; functionality will be gone entirely or just not &quot;enhanced&quot; for 3.0?

-Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris -</p>
<p>Does this mean the &#8220;Promotions, Campaigns, and Bundles&#8221; functionality will be gone entirely or just not &#8220;enhanced&#8221; for 3.0?</p>
<p>-Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
