<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Unit Test Framework Should I Use?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chriscyvas.com/2008/12/08/what-unit-test-framework-should-i-use/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chriscyvas.com/2008/12/08/what-unit-test-framework-should-i-use/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:44:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Knopf</title>
		<link>http://chriscyvas.com/2008/12/08/what-unit-test-framework-should-i-use/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Knopf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 20:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscyvas.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/what-unit-test-framework-should-i-use/#comment-112</guid>
		<description>I personally prefer NUnit.

I like being able to test an assembly for a lightweight .exe rather than VS.

That way, you can move the .dll to the production server, and run tests again (without installing VS or and actual testing framework).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally prefer NUnit.</p>
<p>I like being able to test an assembly for a lightweight .exe rather than VS.</p>
<p>That way, you can move the .dll to the production server, and run tests again (without installing VS or and actual testing framework).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://chriscyvas.com/2008/12/08/what-unit-test-framework-should-i-use/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscyvas.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/what-unit-test-framework-should-i-use/#comment-111</guid>
		<description>try out selenium... i like it better than watin and works perfectly with nunit    plus it outputs flawless c# classes to plug directly in to a VS solution .   You can also do data driven tests that loop over the recorded test methods and pull data in to variables from database, spreadsheet, txt file or whatever.  So essentially all you need to do is create the main driver method and pass some arguments to a selenium test object then sit back and watch test data fly by!

http://selenium.seleniumhq.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>try out selenium&#8230; i like it better than watin and works perfectly with nunit    plus it outputs flawless c# classes to plug directly in to a VS solution .   You can also do data driven tests that loop over the recorded test methods and pull data in to variables from database, spreadsheet, txt file or whatever.  So essentially all you need to do is create the main driver method and pass some arguments to a selenium test object then sit back and watch test data fly by!</p>
<p><a href="http://selenium.seleniumhq.org/" rel="nofollow">http://selenium.seleniumhq.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerry lowry</title>
		<link>http://chriscyvas.com/2008/12/08/what-unit-test-framework-should-i-use/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>gerry lowry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscyvas.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/what-unit-test-framework-should-i-use/#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Glad you found these to be useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you found these to be useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chriscyvas</title>
		<link>http://chriscyvas.com/2008/12/08/what-unit-test-framework-should-i-use/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>chriscyvas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 22:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscyvas.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/what-unit-test-framework-should-i-use/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>I got an email from Gerry Lowry to:

&quot;check out xUnit; also MoQ and WatiN&quot;

He also pointed me to several links:

--------
http://www.codeplex.com/xunit

http://www.codeplex.com/xunit/Wiki/View.aspx?title=WhyDidWeBuildXunit&amp;referringTitle=Home

--------
http://code.google.com/p/moq/
--
MoQ now uses xUnit for its unit tests
http://weblogs.asp.net/cazzu/archive/2008/04/22/moq-now-uses-xunit-for-its-unit-tests.aspx
--
http://www.truewill.net/myblog/index.php/2008/10/06/switching_to_moq
&quot;It&#039;s liberating to have no record/replay model. I also find MoQ relatively intuitive&quot;

--------
&quot;Testing your ASP.NET MVC Controllers with MoQ and xUnit.net&quot;
http://www.shanebauer.com/blog/post/2008/04/Testing-your-ASPNET-MVC-Controllers-with-Moq-and-xUnitnet.aspx

--------
http://watin.sourceforge.net/
--
WaitN and xUnit.NET Integration testing
http://www.codinginstinct.com/2008/05/waitn-and-xunitnet-integration-testing.html

These look very promising!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got an email from Gerry Lowry to:</p>
<p>&#8220;check out xUnit; also MoQ and WatiN&#8221;</p>
<p>He also pointed me to several links:</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
<a href="http://www.codeplex.com/xunit" rel="nofollow">http://www.codeplex.com/xunit</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.codeplex.com/xunit/Wiki/View.aspx?title=WhyDidWeBuildXunit&amp;referringTitle=Home" rel="nofollow">http://www.codeplex.com/xunit/Wiki/View.aspx?title=WhyDidWeBuildXunit&amp;referringTitle=Home</a></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
<a href="http://code.google.com/p/moq/" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/moq/</a><br />
&#8211;<br />
MoQ now uses xUnit for its unit tests<br />
<a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/cazzu/archive/2008/04/22/moq-now-uses-xunit-for-its-unit-tests.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://weblogs.asp.net/cazzu/archive/2008/04/22/moq-now-uses-xunit-for-its-unit-tests.aspx</a><br />
&#8211;<br />
<a href="http://www.truewill.net/myblog/index.php/2008/10/06/switching_to_moq" rel="nofollow">http://www.truewill.net/myblog/index.php/2008/10/06/switching_to_moq</a><br />
&#8220;It&#8217;s liberating to have no record/replay model. I also find MoQ relatively intuitive&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
&#8220;Testing your ASP.NET MVC Controllers with MoQ and xUnit.net&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.shanebauer.com/blog/post/2008/04/Testing-your-ASPNET-MVC-Controllers-with-Moq-and-xUnitnet.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.shanebauer.com/blog/post/2008/04/Testing-your-ASPNET-MVC-Controllers-with-Moq-and-xUnitnet.aspx</a></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
<a href="http://watin.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://watin.sourceforge.net/</a><br />
&#8211;<br />
WaitN and xUnit.NET Integration testing<br />
<a href="http://www.codinginstinct.com/2008/05/waitn-and-xunitnet-integration-testing.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.codinginstinct.com/2008/05/waitn-and-xunitnet-integration-testing.html</a></p>
<p>These look very promising!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerry lowry</title>
		<link>http://chriscyvas.com/2008/12/08/what-unit-test-framework-should-i-use/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>gerry lowry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscyvas.wordpress.com/2008/12/08/what-unit-test-framework-should-i-use/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>check out xUnit; also MoQ and WatiN

--------
http://www.codeplex.com/xunit

http://www.codeplex.com/xunit/Wiki/View.aspx?title=WhyDidWeBuildXunit&amp;referringTitle=Home

--------
http://code.google.com/p/moq/
--
MoQ now uses xUnit for its unit tests
http://weblogs.asp.net/cazzu/archive/2008/04/22/moq-now-uses-xunit-for-its-unit-tests.aspx
--
http://www.truewill.net/myblog/index.php/2008/10/06/switching_to_moq
&quot;It’s liberating to have no record/replay model. I also find Moq relatively intuitive&quot;

--------
&quot;Testing your ASP.NET MVC Controllers with Moq and xUnit.net&quot;
http://www.shanebauer.com/blog/post/2008/04/Testing-your-ASPNET-MVC-Controllers-with-Moq-and-xUnitnet.aspx

--------
http://watin.sourceforge.net/
--
WaitN and xUnit.NET Integration testing
http://www.codinginstinct.com/2008/05/waitn-and-xunitnet-integration-testing.html


regards ... gerry (lowry)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>check out xUnit; also MoQ and WatiN</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
<a href="http://www.codeplex.com/xunit" rel="nofollow">http://www.codeplex.com/xunit</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.codeplex.com/xunit/Wiki/View.aspx?title=WhyDidWeBuildXunit&amp;referringTitle=Home" rel="nofollow">http://www.codeplex.com/xunit/Wiki/View.aspx?title=WhyDidWeBuildXunit&amp;referringTitle=Home</a></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
<a href="http://code.google.com/p/moq/" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/moq/</a><br />
&#8211;<br />
MoQ now uses xUnit for its unit tests<br />
<a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/cazzu/archive/2008/04/22/moq-now-uses-xunit-for-its-unit-tests.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://weblogs.asp.net/cazzu/archive/2008/04/22/moq-now-uses-xunit-for-its-unit-tests.aspx</a><br />
&#8211;<br />
<a href="http://www.truewill.net/myblog/index.php/2008/10/06/switching_to_moq" rel="nofollow">http://www.truewill.net/myblog/index.php/2008/10/06/switching_to_moq</a><br />
&#8220;It’s liberating to have no record/replay model. I also find Moq relatively intuitive&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
&#8220;Testing your ASP.NET MVC Controllers with Moq and xUnit.net&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.shanebauer.com/blog/post/2008/04/Testing-your-ASPNET-MVC-Controllers-with-Moq-and-xUnitnet.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.shanebauer.com/blog/post/2008/04/Testing-your-ASPNET-MVC-Controllers-with-Moq-and-xUnitnet.aspx</a></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
<a href="http://watin.sourceforge.net/" rel="nofollow">http://watin.sourceforge.net/</a><br />
&#8211;<br />
WaitN and xUnit.NET Integration testing<br />
<a href="http://www.codinginstinct.com/2008/05/waitn-and-xunitnet-integration-testing.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.codinginstinct.com/2008/05/waitn-and-xunitnet-integration-testing.html</a></p>
<p>regards &#8230; gerry (lowry)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
